Where redevelopment professionals work together to build better communities.
Jeff Freitas posted a blog post
Jeff Freitas posted a blog postI am curious whether anyone has been able to obtain a title policy for acquisition of property that was once owned by the Redevelopment Agency and subsequently trasnferred to the City. Our DDA is on…Continue
Started by Sara Isgur in AB 1X 26 Apr 19.
Trying to prepare for my oversight board meeting (even though L.A. County hasn't appointed anyone yet...). I've got an idea what my agenda will look like, but would love to see others. Anyone…Continue
Started by Aldo E. Schindler in AB 1X 26 Mar 23.
The Assembly Appropriations Committee voted, 11-3, yesterday (March 22) to pass AB 1585 out and sent it to the Assembly Floor. It has appeared in the “second reading file” for Monday March 26. It…Continue
Tags: legislation, AB1585
Started by Lillian Henegar in Legislation & Coalition Building Mar 23.
ALHAMBRA - All Souls Church has become the latest casualty of the redevelopment debacle, losing key revenue after the city stopped paying the lease for a used car lot on church property.
Alhambra is now waiting for approval from the State Board of Equalization that would allow it to transfer the lease from the redevelopment agency to the city so it can start paying again.
"I don't think the legislators realized in a million years all the problems they were going to cause with…
ContinuePosted by Jeff Freitas on May 24, 2012 at 4:23pm
Posted by Jeff Freitas on May 16, 2012 at 4:13pm
The board overseeing the dissolution of Oxnard's redevelopment agency narrowly voted Wednesday to accept $750 million in potential debts for projects the agency could finish before it disbands.
Read more: http://www.vcstar.com/news/2012/may/09/officials-approve-last-of-redevelopment-projects
Posted by Jeff Freitas on May 10, 2012 at 3:17pm
Efforts to divide what’s left of the City of Santa Barbara’s Redevelopment Agency cash on hand — about $28 million — sparked intense disagreements between city representatives and their county counterparts on the seven-member ad hoc oversight committee. Rejected out of hand was the $14 million City Hall had hoped to set aside for a new police station, but that was expected. More troubling to city reps was the 5-to-2 Oversight Committee vote that they’d have to pay back the $350,000…
ContinuePosted by Jeff Freitas on May 10, 2012 at 3:14pm
© 2012 Created by CRA Connect.